Moussa v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Defendants appeal from an order granting claimants’ motion, pursuant to CPLR 3120, for discovery and inspection of numerous documents and records. The order must be reversed because the documents and records sought are not specifically designated. The hallmark of CPLR 3120 is the requirement for a specific designation in the notice or order (Rios v Donovan, 21 AD 2d 409, 413; City of New York v Friedberg & Assoc., 62 AD2d 407, 409). Claimants’ attempt to designate documents by the use of the word “all” is an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rios v. DonovanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
- John P. v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- City of New York v. FriedbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- Burke v. YudelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Miller v. Columbia RecordsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- M. Farbman & Sons, Inc. v. New York City HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Moore v. SantucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Graziano v. CoughlinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Lauer's Furniture Stores, Inc. v. Pittsford Place AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Murphy v. New York State Education DepartmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.