Legal Opinion

State Of Washington v. Thomas Joseph Feely

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 22, 2016No. 72450-9-IPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVerellen, J.

¶1 Under RCW 9.94A.834, a trial court may impose an endangerment enhancement for the crime of attempting to elude a pursuing police vehicle when “one or more persons other than the defendant or the pursuing law enforcement officer” were endangered by the actions of the defendant during the commission of the crime. We conclude the plain meaning of the enhancement extends to endangering officers who were not following the defendant. Therefore, we reject Thomas Feely’s claim of prosecutorial misconduct for arguing to the jury that officers who deployed spike strips were endangered by his driving.

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. State v. McFarlandWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. EmeryWashington Supreme Court · 2012

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. Christopher B. KeffelerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  2. State Of Washington v. Michael ClarkCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  3. State Of Washington, V. Lynn JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. State v. FeelyWashington Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API