Legal Opinion

Hamilton National Bank of Chattanooga v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided October 3, 1933No. Docket No. 66833PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*66OPINION.

MuedocK:

Both parties agree that the use of the installment method of reporting the profit from the sale in 1927 is proper. There is no difference between them as to any figures. The sole question is, When was the decedent in receipt of the principal and interest on the note for income tax purposes? He died before this proceeding was instituted and his testimony is not available. The note was not produced and we do not know its precise terms or the date of cancellation. However, the petitioner concedes that it was payable “ on or before ” July 7, 1930. The petitioner makes several…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Corliss v. BowersSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Brander v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
  3. Chipley v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1932
  4. Security First Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  5. Loose v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1929

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Martin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1991
  2. Willits v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  3. Harris v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1971
  4. Fromson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  5. Stoller v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API