Legal Opinion

Joseph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 13, 2013No. 4D12-2748PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We affirm the denial of appellant’s motion for postconviction relief. First, Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356, 130 S.Ct. 1473, 176 L.Ed.2d 284 (2010), does not apply retroactively to the 1999 plea. Hernandez v. State, — So.3d - (Fla.2012). Second, appellant does not show that he was present in the country lawfully. Padilla applies only to those who were present in the country lawfully at the time of the plea. Appellant cannot show that the plea is the sole basis for his removability. See Rosas v. State, 991 So.2d 1003 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008).

Affirmed.

WARNER, TAYLOR and CONNER, JJ., concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Rosas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Juan Alberto Blanco Garcia v. State of TennesseeTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Cano v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Angela Rosario v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  4. Ibarra v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  5. Garay v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API