Legal Opinion
Tanner v. Brookshire Grocery Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 2, 1997No. 29276-CAPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
691 So.2d 871 (1997)
Samuel TANNER, et ux., Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
BROOKSHIRE GROCERY COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 29276-CA.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Second Circuit.
April 2, 1997.
Darrel D. Ryland, for Plaintiffs-Appellants.
James A. Mijalis, for Defendant-Appellee.
Before HIGHTOWER, WILLIAMS and CARAWAY, JJ.
CARAWAY, Judge.
In this slip and fall action, the plaintiffs, Samuel and Nessie Tanner, appeal a judgment rendered in favor of defendant, Brookshire Grocery Company. The trial court found that plaintiffs failed to prove that the merchant had actual or constructive notice of the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Welch v. Winn-Dixie Louisiana, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1995
- Johnson v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1993
- Simmons v. City of MonroeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1991
3Cited by15 opinions
- Jones v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
- Turner v. Brookshire Grocery Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2001
- Ward v. ITT Specialty Risk Services, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1999
- Hardman v. Kroger Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2000
- Beggs v. Harrah's New Orleans CasinoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.