Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Jones

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided May 21, 1992PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Joseph Kevin McKay, J.

The defendants have jointly moved once again for dismissals pursuant to CPL 170.30 (1) (e) and 30.30. Previously successful, the defendants suffered a reversal in the Appellate Term, which ordered the reinstatement of the action. (People v Jones, 146 Misc 2d 665, revd 151 Misc 2d 582 [App Term, 2d Dept 1991], lv denied 79 NY2d 921 [Feb. 3, 1992].)

In the first place, the defendants naturally recognize that this court will not entertain any reargument of what was decided by the Appellate Term, which decision gave the *482prosecution an additional 41 days to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. CousartNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Durante v. EvansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Durante v. EvansNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. People v. JonesAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1991
  5. People v. ChangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. OsorioNew York Supreme Court · 2003
  2. People v. BennettNassau County District Court · 2015
  3. People v. OlsenNassau County District Court · 2009
  4. People v. OsorioNew York Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API