Legal Opinion · Dissent

George E. Myers v. United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided July 28, 1971No. 25785Published

1DissentBrowning, Circuit Judge

The rationale of Dunn and Stapf, adopted by the majority, is that since during the 1960-1966 period the statute provided that persons sentenced to a minimum mandatory term must be given credit for time spent in custody before sentence through inability to post bail, the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment requires that persons sentenced during this period to other than minimum mandatory terms must also be given such credit because there is no rational basis for a difference in treatment in this respect between these two classes of persons. See Stapf v. United States, 367 F.2d at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morris Wilbur Lee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. John Aldridge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
  3. Truman Adonis Williams v. United States of America, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API