Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Scull

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 13, 1911No. Appeal, No. 67PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal, No. 67, Oct. T., 1911, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Phila. Co., Dec. Sessions, 1910, No. 397, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Richard W. Scull. .Indictment for violation of the election laws. Before Staples, P. J., specially presiding.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 67, Oct. T., 1911, by defendant, from judgment of Q. S. Phila. Co., Dec. Sessions, 1910, No. 397, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Richard W. Scull. .Indictment for violation of the election laws. Before Staples, P. J., specially presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court and in the report of the case of Com. v. Weiserth, ante, p. 592. Verdict of guilty upon which the defendant was sentenced to pay a fine of $50.00. Defendant appealed. Errors assigned were various instructions.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

In view of some suggestions that have been made in this case, and in order to preven!; misapprehension of the scope of our decision, we remark that the defendant was not charged in the indictment with conspiracy, nor with willful fraud under sec. 102 of the act of 1839, nor with failure to observe his oath to attend the election during the continuance thereof “and faithfully assist the inspectors in carrying on the same,” and to use his “best endeavor to prevent any fraud, deceit, or abuse in carrying on the same by the citizens qualified to vote or otherwise,” nor with…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. DegnanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API