Legal Opinion

Grohousky v. Long

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to the district court for Cuming county. Tried below before Crawpord, J.

1Opinion of the Court

Maxwell, Ch. J.

In February, 1885, the plaintiff filed his petition in the county court of Cnming county, in which he alleges, “that he is the owner in fee simple of the S.E. J Sec. 16, Town. 23, Range 6; that he had the right of possession of said premises ever since October 27, 1884; that said Daniel Long, defendant, about October 27, 1884, unlawfully and forcibly entered into possession of said premises, and has ever since and does still unlawfully and forcibly detain the same from the said plaintiff; that said plaintiff, on January 28, 1885, served upon said defendant, as required by law,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nightingale v. BarensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1879
  2. Dawson v. DawsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Goracke v. HintzNebraska Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Buel v. BuelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Northwestern State Bank v. HanksNebraska Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Malloy v. MalloyNebraska Supreme Court · 1888

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API