Legal Opinion

In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Bitzer

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 25, 1924PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.:

The evidence submitted by the contestants on the various issues was utterly insufficient to justify the submission of any of the questions contained in the order framing issues to the jury. The soundness of mind of the testatrix was conceded. No proof was adduced on the issues of fraud and undue influence to meet the standards laid down by the authorities in this State. (Matter of Reuf, 180 App. Div. 203; affd., 223 N. Y. 582; Matter of Kindberg, 207 id. 220; Matter of Price, 204 App. Div. 252, 253.)

On the question dealing with the execution of the will, the testimony of the three…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In re RuefAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
  2. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of PriceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  3. In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament of KearneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  4. In re the Probate of Paper Propounded as the Last Will & Testament of CaffreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. In Re Proving the Will of KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1920

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of GrubertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API