Legal Opinion

City of Detroit v. Qualls

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1990No. 83408, (Calendar No. 7)Published

1Opinion of the Court

434 Mich. 340 (1990)

454 N.W.2d 374

CITY OF DETROIT

v.

QUALLS

Docket No. 83408, (Calendar No. 7).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued June 7, 1989.

Decided April 3, 1990.

Donald Pailen, Corporation Counsel, Harnetha Jarrett, Assistant Corporation Counsel, and David L. Rose, Pro Hac Vice, for the City of Detroit.

Hugh M. Davis, Jr., for the defendant.

BOYLE, J.

An issue regarding the validity of a provision in an ordinance may be resolved in a forfeiture proceeding on a summary disposition motion for purposes of collateral estoppel. We find, however, that the city failed to persuade this Court that the…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  5. United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API