Legal Opinion

In Re Thomas M. Kelly, Debtor. Chris Okoye v. Thomas M. Kelly

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 25, 1996No. 95-15931PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On August 80, 1994, the bankruptcy court entered an order that a state court judgment debt owed by the debtor/appellee Thomas M. Kelly to the appellant Chris Okoye was non-disehargeable under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6). The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit (the BAP), in a published opinion, reversed. Kelly v. Okoye (In re Kelly), 182 B.R. 255 (9th Cir. BAP 1995).

The issue in this appeal is whether collateral estoppel applies to preclude Kelly from asserting, in Okoye’s adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court, that the state court judgment debt did not result from any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kelly v. Okoye (In Re Kelly)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  2. Honkanen v. Hopper (In Re Honkanen)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Plyam v. Precision Development, LLC (In Re Plyam)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  4. Hayhoe v. Cole (In Re Cole)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Younie v. Gonya (In Re Younie)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API