Tung-Sol Electric Inc. v. Board of Review
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
*399The opinion of the court was delivered by
Clapp, S. J. A. D.
The reargument of this case presents two questions not dealt with in our earlier opinion, 34 N. J. Super. 349 (App. Div. 1955) : first, whether the claimant here rendered herself ineligible for unemployment compensation because she limited her availability for work (N. J. S. A. 43 :21-4(c)) to a second shift, namely, from 3 :30 p. M. until midnight; and, second, assuming nevertheless that she was eligible when first discharged, must she, in order to entitle herself to continuing benefits after being unemployed for some months, make…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Haynes v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Ford Motor Co. v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Unemployment Compensation Commission v. TomkoSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Swanson v. Minneapolis-Honeywell Regulator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Jacobs v. Office of Unemployment Compensation & PlacementWashington Supreme Court · 1947
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Texas Employment Commission v. HaysTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Nurmi v. Vermont Employment Security BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1963
- State v. VonderfechtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- Aladdin Industries, Inc. v. ScottTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
- Huntley v. Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.