Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. Bambrey
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Error, No. 123, Oct. T. 1888, to C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., to review a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff in an action on the case, by Minnie Bambrey against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., at March Term, 1886, No. 660. The declaration alleged that “ whereas, before and at the time of the committing of the grievances, the said defendant company did maintain, manage, operate and control a certain line of railway between Everson to Ohio Pyle Falls and other points, viz.:…
Read the full summary
Error, No. 123, Oct. T. 1888, to C. P. No. 1, Allegheny Co., to review a judgment on a verdict for plaintiff in an action on the case, by Minnie Bambrey against the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., at March Term, 1886, No. 660. The declaration alleged that “ whereas, before and at the time of the committing of the grievances, the said defendant company did maintain, manage, operate and control a certain line of railway between Everson to Ohio Pyle Falls and other points, viz.: in the county aforesaid.; that heretofore, viz.: on the first day of January, 1886, the plaintiff was a passenger on…
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
None of the assignments of error can be sustained. The rulings of the learned judge of the court below, and his instructions to the jury, cannot be impeached.
The judgment is' affirmed.
2Cited by11 opinions
- Willson v. Northern Pacific RailroadWashington Supreme Court · 1893
- Hot Springs Railroad v. DeloneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1898
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. MartinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
- Northern Pac. R. v. PausonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1895
- G.C. S.F. Ry. v. RatherCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.