Legal Opinion
Burnstein v. Mandalay Caterers
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 23, 2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schmidt, J.), dated June 24, 2002, as granted that branch of the motion of the defendants Mandalay Caterers and Thelma Calogera which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The respondents demonstrated their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by establishing that the plaintiff was unable to identify the cause…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Christopher v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Novoni v. La Parma Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Visconti v. 110 Huntington Associates, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
3Cited by7 opinions
- Siegel v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Tejada v. JonasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Lissauer v. Shaarei Halacha, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Rodriguez v. CafaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Weinberg v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.