Citizens' National Bank v. Marks
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 6, May T., 1906, by plaintiff, from order of C. P. Mifflin Co., April T., 190-1, No 53, making absolute rule to open judgment in case of The Citizens’ National Bank v. Florence L. Marks. Rule to open judgment. Before Woods, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order making absolute rule to open judgment.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Head, J.,
In the spring of 1901 the defendants were indebted to the plaintiff in the sum of $2,000, evidenced by three notes, to wit: one for $500 due January 7, 1901, a second for the same sum due April 8,1901, and a third for $1,000 due May 14, 1901. The last mentioned note was probably a renewal of a former one of like amount. Each one- of these notes was signed by one W. C. Prickett and the appellee, Florence L. Marks. At the time the first loan was made the former was an entire stranger to the bank and to the communitj^ while the latter was the local manager of the telephone…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Dunn v. Washington Building & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Keen v. Vaughan'sSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1865
- Stoystown & Greensburg Turnpike Road Co. v. CraverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1863
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ferguson v. O'HaraSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926