Legal Opinion

Frazier v. Frazier

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 15, 1984No. Civ. 4249PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is post-divorce periodic alimony litigation.

The 1968 divorce decree ratified and confirmed an agreement of the parties whereby Mr. Frazier agreed to pay to Mrs. Frazier as periodic alimony the weekly amount of fifteen dollars, which was to be increased to twenty-five dollars a week in 1973. Social Security benefits were not mentioned in either the agreement or the decree.

Mr. Frazier was current in his alimony payments when he reached the age of sixty-five. At that time he was required to retire by his employer because of age. Thereafter, he drew his Social Security from the federal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Horton v. HortonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1963
  3. Binns v. MaddoxCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  4. Bowden v. BowdenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Andrews v. CITY NAT. BANK OF BIRMINGHAMSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Edmac McCallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Spalding v. SpaldingMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Johnson v. JohnsonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2015
  4. Susan Harris v. Thomas L. HarrisMississippi Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Betty H Spalding v. William H SpaldingMississippi Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API