Legal Opinion

General Leasing Co. v. Manivest Corp.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1983No. 18348PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OAKS, Justice:

This is an action by the lessor of equipment against the owner of premises where it was installed, for conversion damages for failure to return the equipment on demand. The issues on this appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff concern fixtures and unjust enrichment.

Manivest, the property owner, leased its premises to a car dealer for fifteen years. About six years later, in order to upgrade the building’s temperature control, the dealer leased air-conditioning and heating equipment from General Leasing Company, which purchased the equipment and installed it on the premises at…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. McCollum v. ClothierUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Paul Mueller Co. v. Cache Valley Dairy Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Commercial Fixtures & Furnishings, Inc. v. AdamsUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Rapp v. Mountain States Telephone & Telegraph Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Frank M. Hall & Co. v. Southwest Properties VentureColorado Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API