Legal Opinion

Pate v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1934No. 8 Div. 923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

This appellant was indicted on three counts for unlawfully obtaining $5,500 from the East Lauderdale Banking Company. The three counts in the indictment are based upon the same transaction. Count 1 charges embezzlement under section 3964 of the Code 1923. Count 2 charges a violation of section 3412 of the Code 1923. Count 3 charges the appellant with larceny of the money in question. These are kindred offenses, and, as stated, are predicated upon the same transaction.

The case at bar is identical with the case of McLemore v. State, ante, p. 228, 157 So. 455. Every…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McLemore v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pate v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API