Legal Opinion

Worley v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided July 23, 1925No. A-4832PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

The plaintiff in error will be referred to as defendant, as in the court below. From a conviction on a charge of larceny of domestic animals, the defendant has appealed.

The record discloses that the defendant and two others were jointly charged with the larceny of hogs from a car and from the stockyards at Stillwell. A severance was had and the defendant tried separately. The principal question raised in defendant’s briefs is that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the verdict, but at most establishes no more than the receiving of stolen property. The fact of the larceny is undisputed.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ballard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Guthrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. Patton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Foust v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Weatherman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API