Brihn v. Truch (In re Truch)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
KATHRYN C. FERGUSON, US Bankruptcy Judge
Dear Mr. Brihn and Mr. Brown:
At the close of Mr. Brihn’s case on January 15, 2014, the Truch’s counsel made a motion for a directed verdict.1 The court issues the following findings of fact and conclusions of law resolving that motion.
Before the court can address the substance of the motion, it must clarify the causes of action alleged in the complaint. Mr. Brihn, representing himself, filed a document2 in June 2012 “contesting the dis-chargeability of the Truch’s debt owed to creditor Richard W Brihn.” The only law cited in the complaint is “11 USC 523…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Bullock v. BankChampaign, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2013
- In Re: James L. Blaszak, Debtor. Commonwealth Land Title Co. v. James L. BlaszakCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
- In Re StrackCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Michael Rego, in No. 98-1386 v. Arc Water Treatment Company of Pa., A/K/A Arc Water Treatment Company, A/K/A Arc Company Arc Water Treatment Company of Maryland, Inc. Michael Rego v. Arc Water Treatment Company of Pa., A/K/A Arc Water Treatment Company, A/K/A Arc Company Arc Water Treatment Company of Maryland, Inc. Arc Water Treatment Company of Maryland, Inc., in No. 98-1616Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Christman v. FarinaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- Howard v. Howard (In re Howard)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015