Legal Opinion

Barnett v. Ashley

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 2, 1954No. 34983PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

Counsel for the defendant in error in their brief contend that the nonsuit was properly granted because the plaintiff’s evidence was insufficient to make out a case in the following respects: (a, b) she failed to prove that her intestate owned the timber which was the subject matter of the alleged sale and that the defendant cut any of the timber or received any of the proceeds thereof; (c) she failed to prove any amount, so that there would not be sufficient evidence to support a verdict for any given sum; (d) she failed to prove a contract sufficiently definite to be enforceable; and (e)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Clark v. BandySupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Ray v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
  3. Jones v. HogansSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  4. Mullins v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1948
  5. Pope v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kyle v. Green Acres at Verona, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  2. Peach v. PeachAppellate Court of Illinois · 1966
  3. Charter Peachford Behavioral Health System, Inc. v. Kohout.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  4. Speiser v. U.S. Department of Health & Human ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1986
  5. Hornig v. HornigMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API