Legal Opinion
Niedner v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power District
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided January 10, 1979No. 13594PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STRUCKMEYER, Vice Chief Justice.
Appellant George E. Niedner brought an action for breach of an employment contract against the Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power District claiming that his employment was unconstitutionally terminated. The Superior Court granted the District’s motion to dismiss, and Niedner appealed. This Court acquired jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 19(e), Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.
Niedner’s complaint alleges that on December 22, 1972, he was notified that his employment as Supervisor of Revenue Receipts was being terminated and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jackson v. Metropolitan Edison Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moose Lodge No. 107 v. IrvisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- State v. DroutmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ball v. JamesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Louis Gorenc v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement and Power DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- James v. BallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
- Teran v. Citicorp Person-To-Person Financial CenterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.