Legal Opinion

Swan v. Stuart

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided November 6, 1961No. 23385PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROADDUS, Judge.

Plaintiffs, Paul Swan and Frances Mae Swan, are husband and wife. They instituted this action against defendant seeking to recover damages growing out of an automobile collision. Plaintiffs’ petition was in three counts. In Count I plaintiff, Frances Mae Swan, sought damages for personal injuries. In Count II both plaintiffs prayed for damages to their automobile, and in Count III, plaintiff, Paul Swan, asked damages for loss of his wife’s services.

The jury returned a verdict awarding plaintiff, Frances Mae Swan, $1,000 for personal injuries (Count I of plaintiffs’ petition),…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Magee v. Mercantile-Commerce Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1936
  2. Anderson v. MetcalfSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  3. Young v. RauppMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lynch v. Webb City School District No. 92Missouri Court of Appeals · 1963
  2. First Presbyterian Church of Monett v. FeistMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
  3. Rakestraw v. NorrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1971
  4. Swan v. StuartMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  5. Kuta v. CollierMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API