Legal Opinion

Severns Drilling Co. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 8, 1936No. Civ. No. 11026PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is an application for a writ of prohibition to restrain the respondent court from enforcing its order authorizing an inspection and survey of an oil well owned and operated by petitioner.

An examination of the record before us discloses that the trial court had jurisdiction to authorize and require the survey of petitioner’s oil well. (Union Oil Co. of California v. Reconstruction Oil Co et al., 4 Cal. (2d) 541 [51 Pac. (2d) 81].)

Therefore, since the trial court had jurisdiction to make and enter its order, the writ of prohibition must be denied. *282The rule is well settled that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Union Oil Co. v. Reconstruction Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
  2. County of Sutter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Severns Drilling Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. Severns Drilling Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API