Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Thomas

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 2002No. CV-01-0001-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 This is a habeas corpus proceeding in which the trial judge determined that the prisoner, Kevin Lewis McDonald, was not entitled to relief. The court of appeals affirmed, holding that former Governor Fife Symington had complied with the law in denying commutation of McDonald’s sentence. We granted review to determine whether the manner in which Governor Symington’s office handled this matter complied with constitutional and statutory requirements. We have jurisdiction under article VI, § 5(1) and (4) of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S. § 12-2101(L)(1).

FACTS

¶ 2…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State Ex Rel. Woods v. BlockArizona Supreme Court · 1997
  3. J.W. Hancock Enterprises, Inc. v. Arizona State Registrar of ContractorsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  4. State v. MarquezArizona Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Ex Parte GuyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1928

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State of Arizona v. Ronnie Roy VeraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. State Ex Rel. Thomas v. RayesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  4. Ward v. StewartDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2007
  5. Galaz v. StewartArizona Supreme Court · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API