Legal Opinion
United States v. John Joseph Ahern and Carl Eugene Hines
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 3, 1980No. 78-1730, 78-1731PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.
Ahern and Hines were each convicted by a jury on charges of conspiracy, 18 U.S.C. § 371, violation of the Mann Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2421, and violation of the Travel Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1952(a)(3). On appeal both defendants raise essentially the same matter: (1) permitting the wives of the two defendants to testify against the defendants over the latters’ objections; (2) refusal of the district court to grant a new trial when a prosecution witness, Connie Reese Hines, wife of the defendant Hines, recanted certain testimony given by her at trial; (3) admission of evidence…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hawkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. William Earl BurkhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Wyatt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Richard J. MaestasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Robert Hall Lewis, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Louis W. Wegerer and Judith A. Wegerer v. First Commodity Corporation of BostonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Lawrence KearneyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Haouari v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Cecil Leon RamseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Dearld Gene Davis, A/K/A "Doc" Davis, and Phillip Martin McFarlandCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.