Hepworth v. State

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

Hawkins, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant insists that the evidence relied on by the State does not meet the rule demanded where circumstantial evidence is involved.

Upon original submission we were not favored with a brief for appellant and in the motion for rehearing and the brief and argument in support thereof our attention is called to some matters overlooked originally. We attached some significance to the evidence that when appellant was arrested there was found in his possession another check similar to the one declared on in the indictment. It is…