Legal Opinion
Liebeskind v. Metal Frame Aquarium Co.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 21, 1959PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
58 N.J. Super. 504 (1959)
156 A.2d 701
MOLLIE LIEBESKIND, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
METAL FRAME AQUARIUM COMPANY, A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT, AND ROSEWELL HOLDING AND IMPROVEMENT COMPANY, ETC., DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued November 24, 1959.
Decided December 21, 1959.
Before Judges PRICE, GAULKIN and SULLIVAN.
Mr. Ernest F. Keer, Jr., argued the cause for defendant-appellant (Messrs. Boyd, Dodd, Keer & Booth, attorneys).
Mr. Frank C. Scerbo argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent and cross-appellant.
The opinion of the court was delivered by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Verhagen v. PlattSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
- Hammett v. RosensohnSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1958
- Mitchell v. D'OlierSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1902
- Textileather Corp. v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
- Kinane v. FaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cohen v. Fair Lawn Dairies, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Dorofee v. Pennsauken Tp. Planning Bd.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Alexander S. v. Arnold ConstableNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
- Computer Property Corporation v. Columbia Distributing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974