Legal Opinion
Austin Daily Herald v. Mork
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided November 5, 1993No. C4-93-2186PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SPECIAL TERM OPINION
ANDERSON, Chief Judge.
FACTS
Media representatives seek a writ of prohibition, challenging orders restricting access during parts of a criminal trial.
Before trial began on charges of criminal sexual conduct, the trial court ruled defense counsel would be allowed to cross-examine juvenile victims regarding their prior juvenile records. The court ordered the public excluded from the criminal trial during the testimony of juvenile victims and scheduled a hearing on media objections to the restricted access. See Minn.R.Crim.P. 25.03 (procedures for issuing a restrictive order).
At…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pell v. ProcunierSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bantam Books, Inc. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ABC, Inc. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
- Baltimore Sun Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995