Legal Opinion

Eaton v. Fitchburg Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 10, 1880PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtColt, J.

The first count in the plaintiff’s declaration contains a general allegation that she was injured at a grade crossing while travelling in the highway, “ by reason of the carelessness and negligence of the agents and servants of the defendant.” It was admitted that the defendant corporation had never been requested by the selectmen, or ordered by the county commissioners or other persons having authority, to erect a gate or place a flagman at this crossing.

*365The judge ruled at the trial that, in passing on the question of the defendant’s negligence, it was competent for the jury, under-the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Norton v. Eastern RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
  2. Favor v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  3. Commonwealth v. Boston & Worcester RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Hayes v. Michigan Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MageeTexas Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Felton v. AubreyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
  5. Hicks v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1895

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API