Legal Opinion

United States v. D. H. Grant & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 16, 1959No. 5002PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

This appeal is from a judgment of the Customs Court, Second Division, C.D. 2065, sustaining importer’s protest and holding the merchandise in dispute to be classifiable under paragraph 907 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT), T.D. 51802, as “waterproof cloth, wholly or in chief value of cotton * * The collector classified the imported fabric under paragraph 904 (c) and (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by GATT, as “Cotton cloth, printed, dyed or colored * * and assessed it accordingly.

Pertinent for consideration with respect to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Bassichis Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. United States v. Brown & EadieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1905

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. H. Cohen Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  2. Amity Fabrics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  3. Amity Fabrics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  4. Amity Fabrics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
  5. Amity Fabrics, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API