Legal Opinion

Roe v. Reeves

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 2, 2011No. 26967Published

1Opinion of the Court

392 S.C. 143 (2011)

708 S.E.2d 778

Jane ROE and John Roe, Appellants,

v.

Craig REEVES, Victoria A., John Doe, Biological Father and Baby Boy, an infant, Respondents.

No. 26967.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard December 2, 2010.

Decided May 2, 2011.

Rehearing Denied May 18, 2011.

Philip J. Temple, Temple, Mann, Briggs & Hill, of Greenville, and Robert Norris Hill, Law Offices of Robert Hill, of Newberry, for Appellants.

Andrea B. Williams, of Greenville, and Mary Alice H. Godfrey, Godfrey Law Firm, of Greenville, for Respondents.

Katherine H. Tiffany, Guardian Ad Litem, of Carter Smith Merriam…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Lehr v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Adoptive Parents v. Biological ParentsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994
  4. Abernathy v. Baby BoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
  5. McCann v. DoeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2008

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API