Legal Opinion
Mayer v. McBrunigan Construction Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 6, 1986PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover moneys due on a mortgage note, and to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Dachenhausen, J.), dated April 30, 1985, which denied their motion to renew the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and their cross motion for leave to amend their answer.
Order affirmed, with costs.
"Leave to renew should be denied unless the moving party offers a reasonable excuse as to why the additional facts were not submitted on the original application” (Caffee v Arnold, 104 AD2d 352; Teal v Place, 85 AD2d…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Silinsky v. State-Wide InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Caffee v. ArnoldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Lo Breglio v. MarksNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Teal v. PlaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Lo Breglio v. MarksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wodecki v. CartyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Albanese v. StevensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Matthews v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center v. RuscitoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Spear v. HerbertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.