Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

City of Santa Cruz v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1987No. H002643PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

190 Cal.App.3d 1669 (1987)

236 Cal. Rptr. 155

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ, Petitioner,

v.

THE SUPERIOR COURT OF SANTA CRUZ COUNTY, Respondent; GEORGE RUSH, Real Party in Interest.

Docket No. H002643.

Court of Appeals of California, Sixth District.

March 17, 1987.

COUNSEL

Atchison & Anderson and Gerald D. Bowden for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Biggam, Christensen & Minsloff, John M. Gallagher and Ben Rice for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

BRAUER, J.

The City of Santa Cruz seeks a peremptory writ of mandate to compel the superior court to vacate its pretrial criminal discovery order directing city to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Palma v. U.S. Industrial Fasteners, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ballard v. Superior Court of San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. People v. MemroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lemelle v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. City of Santa Cruz v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. City of Alhambra v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. People v. BoyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. City of Redding v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. City of Alhambra v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API