Legal Opinion

United States v. Smith

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided August 31, 1979No. CM 437622PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Contrary to his pleas, appellant was convicted of aggravated kidnapping, communicating a threat, and assault consummated by a battery, in violation of Articles 134 and 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice (U.C. M.J.), 10 U.S.C. §§ 934 and 928, respectively. Appellant was tried at Fort Bliss, Texas. The sentence as approved provided for a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for one year, forfeiture of all pay and allowances and reduction to Private E-l.

The kidnapping offense was charged under Article 134, UCMJ, as a violation of Texas, Penal Code Annotated §…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. United States v. HealySupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. United States v. Anthony L. Cavallaro and Gerald J. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. BunchUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  5. United States v. GaskinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HoardU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1981
  2. United States v. WilliamsU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980
  3. United States v. MitchellU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. Ago, Florida Attorney General Reports1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API