Jones v. State

ON RETURN TO REMAND

TAYLOR, Presiding Judge.

The appellant, Dan Jones, appealed the revocation of his probation. We remanded this ease so that the trial court could make a *773written statement of the reasons for revoking the appellant’s probation and the evidence upon which it relied, in compliance with Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972), and Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778, 93 S.Ct. 1756, 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973). Jones v. State, 671 So.2d 770 (Ala.Cr.App.1995).

The trial court has complied with our directions and has filed the following order:

“Upon…