Legal Opinion

Medley v. City of Milwaukee

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 17, 1992No. 91-1963PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COFFEY, Circuit Judge.

Albert and Anne Medley appeal the district court’s entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendants on the Medleys’ claim that the Housing Authority of the City of Milwaukee (“HACM”) improperly debarred them from participating in HACM’s federally-funded Rent Assistance Program (“RAP”). We affirm.

I. FACTS

The Medleys are the owners of rental properties in the City of Milwaukee and are desirous of leasing their rental units to participants in HACM’s Rent Assistance Program. We have described the Rent Assistance Program as follows:

“Section 8 of the United States Housing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Wisconsin v. ConstantineauSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Ronald Palmer v. Marion County, City of Indianapolis, and Sheriff Jack CotteyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Jeff Dupuy, Belinda Dupuy, Pilar Berman v. Bryan Samuels, Director, Illinois Department of Children and Family ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
  3. Lauer Farms, Inc. v. Waushara County Board of AdjustmentDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
  4. Medley v. City Of MilwaukeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  5. Bryn Mawr Care v. SebeliusDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API