Conwell v. Emrie
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Dearborn Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
Trespass on the case by Conwett against Emrie. Plea, not guilty. The cause was submitted to a jury. Verdict for the defendant. Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the verdict.
The following are the facts proved on the trial:
The plaintiff, in June, 1840, was, and still is, the owner in fee of a certain close or tract of land in Dearborn county, situate at the foot of, and on the north side of a certain public road, on which close he had a tan-yard. The defendant, as supervisor of the road district, &c., constructed a culvert across the road in such a manner as to convey the water…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by4 opinions
- McCord v. HighSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Lampert v. Laclede Gas-Light Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1883
- Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. DaughertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
- Nagle v. WakeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1896