Legal Opinion

Conwell v. Emrie

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1853PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ERROR to the Dearborn Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

Trespass on the case by Conwett against Emrie. Plea, not guilty. The cause was submitted to a jury. Verdict for the defendant. Motion for a new trial overruled, and judgment on the verdict.

The following are the facts proved on the trial:

The plaintiff, in June, 1840, was, and still is, the owner in fee of a certain close or tract of land in Dearborn county, situate at the foot of, and on the north side of a certain public road, on which close he had a tan-yard. The defendant, as supervisor of the road district, &c., constructed a culvert across the road in such a manner as to convey the water…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. McCord v. HighSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Lampert v. Laclede Gas-Light Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1883
  3. Jeffersonville, Madison, & Indianapolis Railroad v. DaughertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Nagle v. WakeyIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API