Legal Opinion

Gustafson v. Gem Twp.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1931No. File No. 722PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPollen, P. J.

The defendant, Gem township, is an organized township in Brown county, and plaintiff is the owner of a *309quarter section of land in said township. Along the east side of said land is a section line highway 66 feet in width. Some forty or more years ago plaintiff’s grantor planted trees along the east side of his land and within the right of-way o-f the said highway. The trees were cultivated and cared for and had attained a considerable size, when, in May, 1930, it was decided by the township supervisors that the ground occupied by the trees was necessary for the use of the road, and plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wells v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Lawrence v. EwertSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Sample v. HarterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Smith v. Pennington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Canton TownshipSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State v. Alaska Land Title Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Costain v. Turner CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Dave Gustafson & Co. v. StateSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. State v. Alaska Land Title Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API