Legal Opinion · Dissent

Solen Corporation v. Robertson

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 19, 1925No. 11721Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

While it was entirely proper for Judge Johnson to consider the several points raised by the defendants in their demurrer to the complaint, I do not think that, upon a rule to show cause why the temporary injunction should be dissolved and an injunction pendente lite be issued, it was within his jurisdiction at chambers in another county, to sustain the demurrer, the effect of which was to dismiss the complaint. This cannot be done at chambers (Dallas v. Inman, 107 S. C., 402; 93 S. E., 8. Kinder v. Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp., 107 S. C., 404; 93 S. E., 7) except under Section 35, Code of Civ.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kinder v. Atlantic Coast Lumber Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  2. Dallas v. InmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API