Lawrence v. AQUARIUS SALES & SERVICE, INC.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
In this workers’ compensation appeal, Claimant seeks reversal of the Judge of Compensation Claims’ (JCC’s) findings regarding maximum medical improvement (MMI) and Claimant’s permanent impairment rating (PIR). Claimant argues that neither his status of having reached MMI, nor the extent of any permanent impairment sustained, was at issue below and, therefore, the JCC erred by making potentially prejudicial findings on these issues.
We agree that Claimant’s PIR was not at issue. A JCC may not rule on issues which are beyond the scope of the hearing, and in the circumstances of this case it was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Scott Smith Oldsmobile v. HoffardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Belly Acres, Inc. v. FrankelDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Booher v. PERKINS RESTAURANT & BAKERY/RISK MANAGEMENT LTD.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
3Cited by5 opinions
- Marin v. Aaron's Rent to OwnDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Hernandez v. Geo Group, Inc./Specialty Risk ServicesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Rosa v. PROGRESSIVE EMPLOYER SERVICESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- City of Venice v. Van DykeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
- Ekechi v. First america/first StudentDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010