Legal Opinion

Louisiana Real Estate Commission v. Blakes

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 2004No. 04-CA-216PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

I a WALTER J. ROTHSCHILD, Judge.

This case arises from a dispute between Lisa and Robert Blakes, who were the prospective buyers of a house, and Shirley and B.R. Malbrough, the sellers, over a $25,000 deposit held by ReMax Real Estate Partners (“ReMax”), which was the Malbroughs’ agent. On December 7, 1999, after being informed by ReMax that there was a dispute over entitlement to the deposit, the Louisiana Real Estate Commission initiated this concursus proceeding, pursuant to LSA-R.S. 37:1435(F) to determine who was entitled to the $25,000. On April 1, 2003, the trial judge rendered summary…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS, NO. 5747Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. Prince v. K-Mart Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2002
  3. Garsee v. BowieLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Estate of Levitz v. BroadwayLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2003
  5. Ekere v. Dupont Chemical PlantLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Burgess v. ZhengLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  2. Kels Kove of Lake Claiborne L L C v. EgnerDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 2024
  3. Kusai Abdelqader v. Ramon Ramos, Jr., Delisha Boyd, LLC, Delisha Young Boyd, and Kristen L. Young-BoydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API