Legal Opinion
Rosenburg v. Bouse
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 25, 1937No. [No. 27, April Term, 1937.]PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPakke, J.
The testator died on March 22nd, 1934, and his will, with' codicils, was admitted to probate. The residuary-estate was devised and bequeathed to trustees, upon a trust to administer the trust during a life in being and to distribute the net income, and, upon the expiration of the life tenancy, to distribute the corpus of the trust as the will directs. The cestuis que. trustent are all collateral beneficiaries, except the widow, who survives. The Orphans’ Court has determined that the value of the interest of the widow is twenty-five per centum of the total value of the residuary estate, and…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Plummer v. ColerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- CARPENTER v. Commonwealth of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1855
- State v. DalrympleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1889
- Cahen v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Attorney General v. StoneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bouse v. HutzlerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1942
- Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. BouseCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Merchants National Bank v. Merchants National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Shaughnessy v. PerlmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
- Coursey v. Hanover BankCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.