Legal Opinion

Oil Well Supply Co. v. Hopper

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 7, 1929No. 28,936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hopkins, J7:

The question involved here is whether a dealer in oil-well casing was liable on an implied warranty that the casing was fit for the particular purpose for which it was sold. The dealer was held not liable, and the purchaser appeals.

The facts were substantially as follows: The plaintiff, a dealer in oil-well casing and other oil-well supplies, sold to the defendant, an oil-well driller, a quantity of 24-pound National seamless pipe or casing which proved to be defective and leaky. The defendant computed his damage and deducted it from his…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. De Witt v. BerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Lukens v. FreiundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  3. Ehrsam v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Illinois Zinc Co. v. SempleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Anchor Serum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  2. Harmon v. CoonrodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Brown v. General Distributors, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1962
  4. Chandler v. Anchor Serum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API