Legal Opinion

Dulien Steel Products, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 30, 1953No. 57731; protest 183327-K (Los Angeles)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the chief liquidator testified that, although not with the entry, the record papers would indicate that the affidavit of the owner, importer, or consignee on customs Form 3311 had been filed. He further testified that the collector’s office was satisfied that the merchandise was of American manufacture and that no drawback had been claimed or paid upon exportation. It was orally stipulated that three items, one universal cruiser crane, designated as SA or SN-69-57, seven truck cranes, designated SA-50-Eng. 2 to 8, and one truck crane, designated SA-50-E-10…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joseph Behr & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API