School District No. 9 v. McLintock

In each of these two consolidated cases, the plaintiff, primary school district, sued to recover back money paid on a void contract and had judgment. Defendants have appealed.

The district had a school site, but change was desired. In October, 1928, the district by its school board entered into a contract with Arthur E. McLintock and Mary E. McLintock for the purchase of certain land in the district for school site. The price was $18,000, $5,000 paid down. The remainder was payable $3,000 per year with interest. The contract contained usual provisions respecting default and re-entry. On this…