Legal Opinion

Benton v. Sutherland Precision Framing

North Carolina Industrial Commission

Decided January 11, 2002No. I.C. NO. 025841Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Full Commission notes that plaintiff elected not to file a brief in support of the errors alleged in the Form 44 Application for Review. Accordingly, pursuant to Workers' Compensation Rule 701, plaintiff was not permitted to present oral argument before the Full Commission. The Order for the Full Commission entered on 3 July 2001 by Chairman Buck Lattimore allowing plaintiff to present oral argument before the Full Commission is hereby vacated.

Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hilliard v. Apex Cabinet Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. Peagler v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Bartlett v. Duke UniversitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  5. Gaddy v. KernCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API