Legal Opinion

Childers v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 5, 2004No. 1031029PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This Court granted the petition of the State for certiorari review of the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals inChilders v. State, 899 So.2d 1023 (Ala.Crim.App. 2003), to determine whether that decision, which reversed Childers's conviction of second-degree robbery, conflicts with our decision in Ex parte Cole, 842 So.2d 605 (Ala. 2002). Because we conclude that the decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals inChilders does not conflict with Cole, we quash the writ of certiorari as improvidently granted.

Facts

In 1985, Childers was indicted for first-degree robbery under §13A-8-41(a)(1),…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Ex Parte KeySupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  3. Ex Parte JordanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Ex Parte ColeSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  5. Ex Parte EdwardsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Tinker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  3. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005
  4. Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  5. Bradley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API