Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Union National Bank of Knoxville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1929PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney

On March 21, 1928, the complainant purchased one hundred shares of the capital stock of the defendant bank from John M. Ross, paying- him therefor the sum of $10,-000 in cash.

The bill alleges the value of the stock to be twenty to thirty per cent of the sum paid, and seeks a decree against the bank for the difference, upon the ground that complainant was induced to purchase the stock by virtue of false representations made to him by certain officers of the bank as to its value.

To state the matter more specifically the complainant contends: (a) that on February 28, 1928, the directors and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yates v. Jones National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Pemiscot County Bank v. Wilson-Ward Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Horrigan v. First National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1877
  4. E. D. Morgan & Co. v. Merchants' National Bank of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dellefield v. Blockdel Realty Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
  2. Armstrong v. Citizens Union National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. B.H., a minor by and through her Parent Sirbrina Bell v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API